[Foundation-l] Sexual Imagery on Commons: where the discussion is happening

[Sue Gardner]

Yeah. I don't remember exactly what Ting said, and even if I did, I wouldn't comment on it.  But FWIW to your point, Ting's not in a chapters-selected seat; Ting was elected by the Wikimedia community.

------Original Message------
From: David Gerard
To: Sue Gardner GMail
To: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Sexual Imagery on Commons: where the discussion is happening
Sent: 9 May 2010 4:21 PM

On 10 May 2010 00:04, Sue Gardner <susanpgardner at gmail.com> wrote:

> My view is that Jimmy and others have brought closure to the "scope of Jimmy's authority" question. In saying that, I don't mean to diminish the importance of that question -- I realize that many people are angry about what's happened over the past week, and it will take time for them to be less angry.


Ting's statements on the role of the Board (that it should regulate
project content) will also take some digesting. I doubt chapters
outside the US put people forward for the Board thinking this would
mean the Board supporting content removal to appease Fox News.


- d.