[Foundation-l] On problems in commons

[Platonides]

Mikemoral wrote:
> But Muhammad's image is not illegal in the US, so why remove them? That has
> no point. Why do we have to remove content perfectly legal under US law?
> Please educate me why.

Who said that the images Jimmy deleted (and which started all this
debate) were illegal in the US?
If they were, we would all agree that kind of images should be deleted.
The problem are borderline, legal images, with a bit of enciclopedical
value, and that nevertheless many people find objectionable.