[Foundation-l] Statement on appropriate educational content

[Anthony]

On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Excirial <wp.excirial at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sexual and medical images might be entirely inappropriate for children, but
> they provide valuable information for other groups of people - for example,
> a gynecologist or a medical student might have a completely non sexual
> reason to look at certain content. Protecting one group might well mean
> that
> we deny valuable data to another.
>

So which group is more important?  Which is the better answer, to tell
families to go elsewhere, or to tell the specialists to go elsewhere?

I dunno, when framed that way it seems the answer is to be family-friendly,
and to let the specialists get their information in specialist resources.