[Foundation-l] Jimbo's Sexual Image Deletions

[Amory Meltzer]

It still works, it's just harder.  And I'm totally with you on the
second point.  Jimmy got a needed process started.  Could he have
started it a different, less dramatic way?  Probably.  Would that have
been better?  Probably.  As effective?  Probably not.  If you're
looking to masturbate, Commons is among the best, most available, and
easiest to navigate sources of material there is - the community can
fix that and decide as a whole what to do, and should, but maybe Jimmy
is playing the maverick and providing a giant leap toward that
discussion.

~A



On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 16:52, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) That argument doesn't apply to old artwork. 2) It is for the
> community to decide what is and isn't educational, not Jimmy. (The
> board acting collectively could overrule the community, but they don't
> seem to have done that.)