[Foundation-l] Top posting

[Mark Williamson]

I'm very disappointed that this discussion has continued at the
expense of one that I find to be much more important to our projects.
Can all of us go back over there and stop talking about this? Kthx.

m.


On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Domas Mituzas <midom.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> kthx
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hoi,
>> An important thread has been derailed by an off topic comment. For your
>> information, and for the somanyth time, top posting comes easy when you use
>> a modern tool like GMAIL. It automatically hides whatever came before. This
>> whole notion has no relevance to me as a consequence.  I get hundreds of
>> mails and the notion that one should be answered differently then others is
>> not easy to consider. I answer to the content to a mail and that is not
>> related to who will receive it.
>>
>> Given that for people who use software that is not as helpful as mine, the
>> experience rates as a nuisance as I appreciate it. It is similar to the use
>> of words or acronyms that are likely not to be understood. For me KTHX is
>> one such, the top rated result makes it a radio station and it took me some
>> time to find that it is likely to mean "Ok, thanks".  The point is not that
>> such words or acronyms should not be used, it is just to indicate that
>> nuisances come in many forms and are a fact of life.
>> Thanks,
>>        GerardM
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>