[Foundation-l] hiding interlanguage links by default is a Bad Idea, part 2
gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Wed Jun 9 15:35:33 UTC 2010
Using words like "pellucid" I am afraid that the average Brit or Yank will
have to look up what you are trying to say, let alone most people for whom
English is a second or third language.
If you are not able / willing to understand what my message to you was, I am
happy to clear things up for you off list.
On 9 June 2010 12:01, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro at gmail.com> wrote:
> Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> > Hoi,
> > The WMF has as its strategy to invest in what has the highest impact.
> > limited resources that makes sense. It also means that while
> > as volunteers we do not have to make such choices, the WMF will and does.
> > It is obvious that depending on your point of view, the choices made by
> > WMF can be fortunate or less so. You are right that it is not in our
> > to make choices, but reality is different. The question is what choices
> > make and what their likely impact is. This brings you to two competing
> > fundamentals; what has the most effect and what is the period to measure
> > those effects.
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
> You are as always, as pellucid as a brick of coal, and totally
> off topic to boot. Please feel welcome to not post comments
> like that again.
> Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
More information about the wikimedia-l