[Foundation-l] Office action

[Nathan]

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Mike Godwin <mnemonic at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:08 PM, <wjhonson at aol.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> What harm do you foresee in replacing deleted pages with a declaration like YouTube uses, "This Video has been deleted
>>
>> based on a copyright claim by The Disney Corporation" ?  And then an extension of "If you believe this is public domain material
>>
>> then restore the page and include this disclaimer blah blah blah"
>>
>>
> We aimed to do something like this.  Can you say what you dislike about the
> current notices, which include the contact information for Gallimard?
>
>
> --Mike


I had the same thought as Will, until I read the actual page Cary
created (which Yann linked to in his original message):
http://fr.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Wikisource:Demande_des_éditions_Gallimard_du_15_février_2010&diff=1547029&oldid=1547025

It says exactly why the pages were deleted, and lists them, and it was
created around the same time the deletions occurred.

Nathan