[Foundation-l] 2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content

[David Gerard]

On 10 December 2010 08:45, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Apart from summarising COM:PORN*, all that the draft sexual content policy
> was meant to do, actually, was to address two cases:
> * Material that is illegal to host for the Foundation under Florida law
> * Sexual images of people uploaded without their knowledge and consent


That would be why I voted "yes". The first category is already
nuke-on-sight, but the second we had some actual examples of.


- d.