[Foundation-l] 2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content

[Andreas Kolbe]

--- On Fri, 10/12/10, WJhonson at aol.com <WJhonson at aol.com> wrote:
> From: WJhonson at aol.com <WJhonson at aol.com>

> > Apart from summarising COM:PORN*, all that the draft
> sexual content 
> > policy 
> > was meant to do, actually, was to address two cases:
> > 
> > * Material that is illegal to host for the Foundation
> under Florida law
> > * Sexual images of people uploaded without their
> knowledge and consent
> > 
> 
> I would think from the voting, that it's now apparent that
> this was not 
> conveyed in the draft policy, as simply as you express it
> here.
> 
> How long is the draft policy, and how short is your summary
> here.
> 
> Apparently something else got added or substracted in the
> meanwhile.


Suggest you read the draft policy, rather than the votes.

A.