[Foundation-l] Pieter Kuiper
jayen466 at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 7 01:09:09 UTC 2010
I had a rather different impression of events around Pieter. I remember several times where he got admins on his case because he nominated copyvios for deletion which said admins had uploaded to Commons.
I'm also not sure whether a sarcastic reference to German efficiency in a talk page discussion qualifies as a racist remark. Etc.
--- On Mon, 6/12/10, Adam Cuerden <cuerden at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Adam Cuerden <cuerden at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Foundation-l] Pieter Kuiper
> To: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Date: Monday, 6 December, 2010, 20:25
> It concerns me greatly that Commons
> seems unable to deal with a user who, at
> various times, has attacked a Jew with anti-semitic
> cartoons, has thrown
> racist abuse at a German theen harassed that user - and
> still has numbers of
> admins willing to unblock him, simply because he does
> supposedly good work
> on Deletion reviews. Diod I mention the Jew was blocked for
> several months
> for A SINGLE COMPLAINT ABOUT HIS BEHAVIOUR?
> Pieter has harassed numerous users away from contributing
> to Wikipedia. That
> he is still editing after all he's done is disgraceful.
> administration has clearly failed, and failed horribly.
> A list of evidence follows:
> The most recent incident was racist abuse against a German
> user, followed by
> The report, which before I noticed and acted upon it was
> full of people
> claiming that racist abuse was fine, and that Pieter was
> being harassed by
> being called out on it, is here:
> Pieter has a block log as long as your arm:
> However, he also has an unblock log, where the same few
> admins constantly
> unblock him, without insisting on a change in the
> problematic behaviour.
> This is a user who gets serial warnings and second chances,
> all the time
> becoming bolder and bolder.
> A few past incidents will suffice:
> The Wall of Shame incident, and the Havang_nl harassment.
> Pieter's modus operandi has been to attempt to harass
> admins who do things
> he dislikes by scouring their image uploads to find
> something to request
> deletion on. The validity of these deletions varies in
> quality, and are
> often grasping at straws. Several of the blocks in the
> block log are for
> One of the clearest incidents was when he attempted to
> refight old battles
> where the DR had gone against him, attacking the admins who
> uploaded and the
> admins who closed the DRs as keep. Here's the wall of shame
> he created.
> The next few edits are him editwarring to keep the Wall of
> Shame up. He got
> blocked for this. He made an unblock, and Havang_nl denied
> it. So he
> promptly attacked Havang.
> I believe there were other incidents involving antisemitic
> cartoons being
> used to attack Mbz1, a Jew, but one can be found here,
> where he constantly
> insists on including a cartoon which he knows will upset
> said Jew.
> this was followed by a WP:POINTy FPC nomination
> It's clear that Commons cannot handle him, and I beseech
> the Foundation to
> step in, investigate the matter, and deal with it. I also
> think that every
> administrator invoilved in defending him, and encouraging
> the harassment of
> other users, should lose their admin rights.
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
More information about the wikimedia-l