[Foundation-l] Creative Commons publishes report on defining "Non-commercial"

[Hay (Husky)]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Nikola Smolenski <smolensk at eunet.yu> wrote:
> jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com wrote:
>> It is my opinion that we should be careful of people who are using
>> restricted software
>> for contributions because it might be in violation of some licenses.
>
> No, we should not. Whatever licenses they are violating, we are not a
> party to these licenses and we are not violating them.
Indeed.

Note that this study is about something completely different, namely
reuse of NC-licensed CC works and when something like that is
'commercial' or not.

-- Hay