[Foundation-l] Pedophilia and the Non discrimination policy
David Levy
lifeisunfair at gmail.com
Sun Nov 29 03:35:26 UTC 2009
Anthony wrote:
> Then I'm merely clarifying for anyone else who read your comment literally.
Okay, but I don't see the relevance.
> > It appears that the user has not edited Wikipedia in a manner
> > advocating pedophilia
> With over 10,000 edits, I can't be troubled to look hard enough to say
> one way or the other,
As far as I know, there has been no assertion that the user has edited
Wikipedia in a manner advocating pedophilia (and in fact, edits to
pedophilia-related articles were examined and found to be neutral).
> especially since the right thing has been done, and this user has been
> indefinitely blocked.
Obviously, not all of us are certain that this was "the right thing."
> I should add that I don't have access to the user's deleted edits.
Virtually all of them are the creation of since-deleted redirects and
disambiguation pages. I recall the massive disruption that they
caused (and Tyciol's stubborn insistence that the community was wrong
about their harmfulness) and view this as a much stronger rationale
for a ban than what is currently under discussion.
More information about the wikimedia-l
mailing list