[Foundation-l] Attribution survey and licensing next steps

[Geoffrey Plourde]

Baseline, maybe?




________________________________
From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2009 10:18:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Attribution survey and licensing next steps

2009/3/7 Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org>:
> The author attribution survey is now closed. We have 1017 complete
> responses.  I've posted results of the attribution data in the
> following report:
>
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attribution_Survey_Results.pdf
>
> I've posted the raw data of the attribution survey here:
>
> Respondents from English Wikipedia:
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attsurvey-en.ods
> Respondents from German Wikipedia:
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attsurvey-de.ods
> Respondents from miscellaneous languages and projects:
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attsurvey-misc.ods

Thanks.

I'm curious, why did you include options that aren't actually
available? No credit and credit to the community are clearly not in
keeping with the license, so knowing who would accept them isn't
particularly useful (although I'm not sure it hurts).

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l