[Foundation-l] Attribution survey, first results

[Geoffrey Plourde]

They wrote the damned thing, so they are most likely to understand it. 




________________________________
From: geni <geniice at gmail.com>
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2009 7:41:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Attribution survey, first results

2009/3/4 Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org>:
> 2009/3/3 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>:
>> Excellent. Getting some idea of community opinion is very important.
>> However, has anyone carried out my suggestion of consulting with the
>> CC lawyers?
>
> We've been in repeated conversations with CC about the possible
> attribution models. CC counsel has commented specifically that
> attribution-by-URL is a permissible attribution model that is
> consistent with the language and intent of CC-BY*.
>

What is their line of reasoning on that?



-- 
geni

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l