[Foundation-l] Election Results
Andrew Turvey
andrewrturvey at googlemail.com
Wed Aug 12 19:25:48 UTC 2009
My first response is that's probably a reflection of the voting system. When you have a non-partisan system like this, there are no clear political pro/con reasons to vote for/against particular candidates and the anti-incumbency factor doesn't really work. Candidates are likely to be successful if they're well known, and that will give an advantage to more established editors.
However, you might be over-stating this conclusion. All three retiring candidates stood again and only two were re-elected - Domas Mituzas lost out to sj.
----- "Steven Walling" <steven.walling at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: "Steven Walling" <steven.walling at gmail.com>
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 August, 2009 20:07:00 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Election Results
>
> While I personally am very pleased with the results, I wonder how the
> election results will be perceived outside Wikimedia.
> With numerous media outlets reacting to PARC's research about the state of
> the community, I fear this endorsement of seemingly "old guard" Wikimedians
> as our Board representation will support claims about the community becoming
> unfriendly to new participants.
> Thoughts? Am I being too nervous, or do others see that potential too?
>
> If I'm not alone, perhaps any official announcement about the elections
> (i.e. on the Wikimedia blog and in press releases) should address this, even
> if only tacitly.
>
> Steven Walling
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Chad <innocentkiller at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Philippe
> > Beaudette<pbeaudette at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > The Wikimedia Foundation's Board Election Committee has concluded the
> > > board selection process, and is pleased to announce that the
> > > candidates ranked as follows:
> > >
> > > Final ranking
> > >
> > > 1 Ting Chen (Wing)
> > > 2 Kat Walsh (mindspillage)
> > > 3 Samuel Klein (Sj)
> > > 4 Gerard Meijssen (GerardM)
> > > 5 Domas Mituzas (Midom)
> > > 6 Thomas Braun (Redlinux)
> > > 7 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen (Cimon Avaro)
> > > 8 Steve Smith (Sarcasticidealist)
> > > 9 Dan Rosenthal (Swatjester)
> > > 10 José Gustavo Góngora (Góngora)
> > > 11 Brady Brim-DeForest (Bradybd)
> > > 12 Lourie Pieterse (LouriePieterse)
> > > 13 Adam Koenigsberg (CastAStone)
> > > 14 Ralph Potdevin (Aruspice)
> > > 15 Beauford Anton Stenberg (B9 hummingbird hovering)
> > > 16 Gregory Kohs (Thekohser)
> > > 17 Kevin Riley O'Keeffe (KevinOKeeffe)
> > > 18 Relly Komaruzaman (Relly Komaruzaman)
> > >
> > > A full pairwise defeats table will be posted shortly.
> > >
> > > These names have been respectfully submitted to the Board, which has
> > > moved to seat the top three candidates.
> > >
> > > The Committee wishes to thank all those who submitted themselves as
> > > candidates. It was a broad and diverse field this year. We also wish
> > > to recognize the many volunteers that helped with this process. The
> > > committee extends its gratitude and thanks to them
> > >
> > >
> > > For the committee,
> > > Philippe
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > foundation-l mailing list
> > > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> > >
> >
> > Congrats to the winners!
> >
> > -Chad
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the wikimedia-l
mailing list