[Foundation-l] Language proposal policy

[Mark Williamson]

Can someone clarify the phrase "this must be used at present as
Engineered language or pretend to be used as international auxiliary
one, additionally to have literary pieces written previously by people
other than the creator of the language. They are excluded those which
are only used at present with artistic purposes."

That doesn't parse for me.

Mark

2008/9/15 Leigh Babbage <gladysthegroovymule at yahoo.co.uk>:
> Crazy Lover <always_yours.forever at ...> writes:
>
>>
>> we take the best arguments to built the current community draft.
>>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Language_proposal_policy/Community_draft
>>
>> it is almost complete. now, we ask community to finish it completely. remember
> many projects is waiting for it.
>>
>> Give your comments.
>>
>> C.m.l.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at ...
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>>
>
>
> Yes, and we can't afford to spend years bickering over minor and unimportant
> details. The policy looks quite good now, and if it were my choice, I would
> approve it.
>
> LB
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>