[Foundation-l] Community draft of language proposal policy

[Gerard Meijssen]

Hoi,
The RFC4646 is even more restrictive then the ISO-639-3. This RFC is imho of
little value for our purposes. I think what you  have written demonstrates
that you do not know that much about the subject.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Tim Starling <tstarling at wikimedia.org>wrote:

> Jesse Plamondon-Willard wrote:
> > The community draft for a language proposal policy stagnates while
> > some complain fashionably about the lack of community involvement in
> > the approval process (and the subcommittee unfairness/conspiracy/evil
> > thereof). If you're interested enough to comment on the policy on
> > mailing lists, please comment on or edit the community draft.
> >
> >>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Language_proposal_policy/Community_draft
> >>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta_talk:Language_proposal_policy/Community_draft
> >
>
> Fair comment. I have edited the community draft as per the opinions
> expressed by several people on this list:
>
> Diff:
> <
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta%3ALanguage_proposal_policy%2FCommunity_draft&diff=1165824&oldid=1165538
> >
>
> Permalink:
> <
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Language_proposal_policy/Community_draft&oldid=1165824
> >
>
> -- Tim Starling
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>