[Foundation-l] STOP DOUBLE STANDARD!!! OR HYPOCRESY!!!

[Ilario Valdelli]

It's different.

There are latin speakers in the Vatican for example.

"De facto" (ops... latin) this is not the "classic" latin language but 
it's a modified language ("ecclesiatic" latin) which can be considered 
like an artificial language.

For this reason it can be compared with the Esperanto and the wikinews 
can be accepted because:

"/If the proposal is for an artificial language such as Esperanto 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto>, it must have a reasonable 
degree of recognition as determined by discussion".

/In any case a community can be present 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin#Modern_use_of_Latin).

Ilario

Marcus Buck wrote:
>
> There's nothing wrong with it except that it does not meet the 
> requirements of the language proposal policy for new projects 
> (<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_proposal_policy>). That policy 
> asks for native speakers. That is nonsense, imho, but that's the text of 
> the policy.
>
> Slomox
> Marcus Buck
>   
>
>
>