[Foundation-l] Meta-arbcom (was: the foundations of...)

[Thomas Dalton]

On 05/01/2008, hillgentleman <hillgentleman.wikiversity at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Dalton,
> > Communication involving the parties would need to be translated,
>
> Of course.
> What I am saying is that people  participate in any language
> and then somebody translate it to a common (major) language
> chosen for the case if there is need.
>
> In my proposal you see the arguments in both the source language
> and a major language.

The arguments from the parties, yes. I'm talking about discussion
within the committee. Once they've heard the arguments they need to
deliberate and reach a conclusion - that deliberation needs to happen
in one language or it's simply impractical.