[Foundation-l] To -l or not to -l?

[Aphaia]

Agreed with David.
-ml and -l are traditional list address suffixes which help us to
notice what they are.

And now our system works well, I think. The lists are remembered in
their names for years. Renaming may make at least over 600  people to
change their mail application settings.

On 9/13/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/09/2007, Sean Whitton <sean at silentflame.com> wrote:
>
> > Some time ago it was posted onto this list that the Wikimedia mailing
> > lists had been moved onto lists.wikimedia.org and, if I recall
> > correctly, we were told that we should stop using -l on the end (of
> > new lists) as this distinction didn't make sense anymore. When I
> > created the ComProj mailing list, I just requested comproj@
> > However, I am noticing that a lot of new lists are being created with
> > -l. Yes, it is tempting, it is very much in my head to... but is there
> > a consensus of which way to go? It seems to me that we should do one
> > thing or the other. Or am I missing something?
>
>
> I see nothing wrong myself with -l on list names. It reminds people
> we're talking about a list.
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


-- 
KIZU Naoko
  Wikiquote: http://wikiquote.org
  * habent enim emolumentum in labore suo *