[Foundation-l] checkuser

[Dan Rosenthal]

Off topic, but why does my email appear to be coming from the bounces  
address with "on Behalf of Dan Rosenthal" in the title? Is something  
broken on my end?

-Dan
On Jul 28, 2007, at 8:33 PM, Casey Brown wrote:

> How many cases there were...
> What were the accusations... (nothing specific i.e. what sort of  
> abuse)
> Where they all solved... (how fast?)
> What were the threats...
>
> There are many other possible questions as well.  It is best to see  
> what the
> Ombudsman themselves share.
>
> Casey Brown
> Cbrown1023
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org
> [mailto:foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Dan  
> Rosenthal
> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 7:47 PM
> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] checkuser
>
>
> On Jul 28, 2007, at 7:13 PM, elisabeth bauer wrote:
>
>> 2007/7/29, Florence Devouard <Anthere9 at yahoo.com>:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I got several requests about this, so this mail is mostly to get the
>>> ball rolling. Nothing urgent !
>>>
>>> Checkuser ombudsmen have been appointed now a year ago by the board.
>>> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/ 
>>> Resolution:Ombudsperson_checkuser
>>>
>>> I guess it is time for a renewal and little feedback on this, and
>>> more
>>> generally, on checkusers.
>>>
>>> So, please reflect on the following points if appropriate
>>
>> I'd like to add one point:
>> Could the ombudsmen please provide a report on the mailing list
>> (without going into private details of course) how many cases they
>> have handled, what have been the issues and how they have been
>> resolved?
>>
>> greetings,
>> elian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
> I can't see why that would be necessary. Considering the ombudsman
> commission is there to investigate breaches of privacy policy,
> including potentionally litigious instances (as taken from the
> resolution), I don't see what's necessary out of that for the public
> to be aware of. I don't see much information would be available to be
> given about the cases individually due to privacy concerns: what
> little information would be left is what...how many cases there are?
>
> -Dan Rosenthal
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l