[Foundation-l] Wikipedia:Office Actions

[Brad Patrick]

That is entirely a matter for Mike and the new Board to deal with, first, at
the abstracted level of when legal counsel is going to have anything to say
about project-level issues and why; second, when a credible legal threat
exists, what action the Foundation is willing to take to make its existence
known to the community, and if it includes something like WP:OFFICE.

As an aside, Delirium, if your understanding of organizational structure is
so profoundly lacking as to not see what the significance of having a
legally existing Foundation is (and mind you, it already has existed for a
few years), I strongly suggest you divert some of your online energies to
learning about non-profit corporations before weighing in further.  WMF is
long past anarchy.  Sorry if that isn't welcome news to you.


On 7/14/07, Aphaia <aphaia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> now we have a house lawyer again.
> It means we will see WP:OFFICE activated even at least on English
> Wikipedia?
>
> On 4/27/07, P. Birken <pbirken at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In the discussion about the german translation of WP:OFFICE, the
> > desire for transparent ways to see whether an action is actually an
> > office action or merely somebody impersonating the office was
> > expressed. I therefore ask the office to soon come up with a clear way
> > of how this is done. Again, I suggest using an office account.
> >
> > Bye,
> >
> > Philipp
>
>
> --
> KIZU Naoko
>   Wikiquote: http://wikiquote.org
>   * habent enim emolumentum in labore suo *
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>