[Foundation-l] Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Robert Horning
robert_horning at netzero.net
Wed Jul 11 20:01:04 UTC 2007
FloNight wrote:
> I suggest a national chapter with state chapters and then local regional
> chapters inside the state chapters. This is the way most national U S
> organizations are organized.
>
> Sydney
>
>
>
>
Hardly. Far more (especially non-profit) groups are organized along
metro areas. The earlier suggestion of using the regional airport code
as a shorthand for the name of the chapter does seem far more appealing.
I can think of a dozen different non-profit organizations who have
significant local bureaucracy on a local level in America that often
stick to metro areas. And the U.S. Census Bureau defined metropolitan
statistical areas (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Statistical_Area) are very
legitimate and non-arbitrary ways of breaking up the USA.
Particularly when it comes to marketing research and establishing branch
offices for corporations, it is very common to work with MSAs to
determine what areas you ought to be serving. Working on a
state-by-state basis only seems to make sense in a political context
such as state chapters of political parties. Or if you have to deal
with legal issues such as state bar associations.
Most Americans live and work in certain regional cities and don't really
give too much attention to what particular state they happen to live or
work in... and often will live in one state and work in another, and go
to church sometimes in a third state. Seriously. The newspapers and
television stations cover the whole of each metro area.
I am strongly supportive of the idea of having metro-area based chapters
for sub-national chapters in the USA, and their charters can mention
explicitly by name the particular MSA that they are intending to
cover... if there is concern about overlapping coverage of multiple
chapters. If you look on that Wikipedia page, nine of the top 25 MSA
cover multiple states (this isn't that unusual), and of note is also
California and Texas, who both have multiple MSAs that would make as
much sense to break up chapter-type organizations. This isn't to say
that a Los Angeles-based Wikimedia chapter can't help the San Francisco
chapter get going, but in terms of coordinating efforts to market
Wikimedia projects or host meetups and local versions of Wikimania, it
makes much more sense to work on a metro area basis.
How this applies to other countries is something that can be debated,
although would Wikimedia-de be averse to allowing separate groups
organizing in Munich and Berlin? That is as close as I can get for a
comparison to Pennsylvania, even though it would make more sense to
compare Vladivostok and St. Petersburg if you were talking about a
national chapter that included Wikimedia users from New York City and
Honolulu. National chapters for all of America is just a bit too much
of a chunk to bite at once, and why it hasn't happened yet.
-- Robert Horning
More information about the wikimedia-l
mailing list