[Foundation-l] Ombudsman Commission: Verification of checkuser results

[Aphaia]

I think it is within the topic, since Ombudsmen are appointed by the
Board, thus the by the  Foundation iirc.

On 7/3/07, Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) <newyorkbrad at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it intentional that this thread is going to the entire Foundation mailing
> list, or was it inadverently sent to the wrong list?
>
> Newyorkbrad
>
>
> On 7/2/07, teun spaans <teun.spaans at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ask the details and motivation from the person who did the cu?
> > ask the details from another cu authorized person?
> >
> >
> > On 7/2/07, Nathan Carter <cartmanau at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > As most of you should be aware I am currently a member of the Ombudsman
> > > Commission (see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission)
> > >
> > > One of my current complaints involves a user who disputes the results of
> > a
> > > CU, as I do not have checkuser access on enwiki how would I go about
> > > verifying the results?
> > > Regards,
> > > Nathan Carter (Cartman02au)
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > foundation-l mailing list
> > > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


-- 
KIZU Naoko
  Wikiquote: http://wikiquote.org
  * habent enim emolumentum in labore suo *