[Foundation-l] Opinions/suggestions for "outside" members of the board?
Anthere
Anthere9 at yahoo.com
Sun Jun 25 12:53:37 UTC 2006
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Anthere wrote:
>
>>Hello
>>
>>How having servers in Africa would help the goal ?
>>
>>Ant
>>
>
> Hoi,
> African ISP's pay for traffic coming from America or Europe.
> Consequently the speed of American and European websites is really poor.
> Within Africa, African websites perform as we would expect them to. By
> having servers in Africa the speed in which we serve our pages would be
> dramatically better. I would argue that we should have our projects in
> African languages completely in Africa and do caching for English and
> French as well.
By dramatically, what do you mean ? Do you have statistics to show the
speed of delivery for a same page, in USA, in the Netherlands and in
South Africa ?
> Hosting in Africa is not as cheap as in either America or Europe.
> Bandwidth is much more expensive. It would be good to find a partner who
> would pay the hosting of our content. There are plenty of universities
> and NGO's who could provide part of such a service. Universities can
> provide expertise and NGO's the funding.
But would the drawbacks of finding and coping with a partner be
significant with regards to the current percentage of readers for which
there would be an improvment and for the level of improvement ?
> The signal value of us having servers in Africa is very important. It
> would help us not only in getting more readers,
Frankly... I do not follow you here. Whether the site is hosted in
Africa or hosted somewhere else is likely to be invisible to the great
majority of reader. I gather most will not care... nor even ask
themselves who host the site. Actually most readers have no idea what
hosting means...
it would help our
> localisation effort.
I do not see how hosting the site on the African continent (say South
Africa) will increase the percentage of translation of the software...
It would help the adoption of MediaWiki as a
> platform to provide information.
Which might be nice, but is not the goal of the Foundation.
The marketing value for our projects is
> really big.
I am not convinced. We also have hosting provided in Korea. Do you think
it improved marketing value of our projects in Asia ? Do you have figures ?
It would also help make the use of African languages
> acceptable by providing content.
I certainly see the benefit of having mediawiki interface translated, I
just fail to see how hosting Wikipedia and other sites in Africa will
help use of African languages more acceptable :-(
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> PS these are the latest *localisation *statistics and the problematic
> messages:
> http://nike.users.idler.fi/betawiki/Localisation_statistics
> http://nike.users.idler.fi/dev/problems.txt
Interesting data !
More information about the wikimedia-l
mailing list