[Foundation-l] Instant Commons : INCORRECT

[Anthere]

Erik Moeller wrote:
> On 6/8/06, Jimmy Wales <jwales at wikia.com> wrote:
> 
>>I will never allow you to use the Wikimedia Foundation name to raise
>>money for a project with no written proposal, no budget, no
>>professionalism, just "trust us, it's a cool idea".
> 
> 
> I wrote specifications, a budget and a full proposal for Kennisnet in
> February.

We have never seen a detailed budget (though we asked).

This proposal named the developers, the roles and
> responsibilities, and the duration of development.

We have not received a timeline (despite repeated requests)

The proposal, as
> written in February, is at
> http://scireview.de/temp/instantcommons_2.odt

...
I can not read .odt...
(shame...)

I suddenly wonder if we got all the right documents...
I suspect not...

> Kennisnet was ready to approve the project as such if Wikimedia was
> happy with it.

... if Wikimedia was happy with it...

I believe SP has received the same document. Let me know
> if that is not the case.

Errrr, can you make a pdf ?

Thanks

ant


> Since then, the only major thing that has happened from my point of
> view is that I answered to some questions that came from SP (via
> Legal). For the most part, there was nothing in there that could not
> have been worked out as the project moves along -- see my response
> from April:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/spcommittee-l/2006-April/000078.html
> 
> Erik