[Foundation-l] This is not an Advertisement
Bruno Martelli
martelli at dm.unipi.it
Fri Dec 29 14:58:07 UTC 2006
Hi everyone.
I have read Brion Vibber's long message yesterday. I appreciated the
frankness of the message: however, I have a different opinion, and I would
like to explain that below.
His analysis could maybe (roughly) summarized as follows: "we need the
money, we really need it, we understand that a little adv is annoying, but
it's really tiny, it's not exactly advertising, and it's only for one
day".
1) A company pays and gets some webspace with its name and
hopefully a logo in it. This is proper 100% advertising. The same one
which every big company does every day all over the world on TV, web,
magazines, etc.
2) The icon is thin, should we deduce that the advertising is just
tiny and harmless? When measuring the impact of it, one should look at
all parameters: the adv is tiny on
each page, little in time (1 day), but really enormous in number
of web pages (some millions: every page on every project!). Summing all
up, it is a huge advertising campaign, reaching many thousands of
people.
3) Reaching many thousands of people (editors and readers) with a little
annoying message. That is what it is, concretely. There is a name for
things like that, which everyone knows and detests: it's "spam". Don't we
all detest spam? I think so, there should be no need of discussion about
that.
4) For this simple reason I disagree with the choice of the WMF of putting
name and logo of a donating company on each page. We editors do our little
constant work everyday against self-promotion on the encyclopedia. We say
"no" to unknown artists, tourist agencies, little companies who simply try
to write few lines about themselves on a single page. Recently, a message
(was it from the WMF?) was written in order to wake the troops: "we
are losing the battle against self-promotion!". In the meanwhile, we see
a big company spammed *everywhere*... One could argue that promotion
"inside" the encyclopedia is different from "outside", but the web page is
the same.
5) We need the money. Ok, but how much? Of course I have no idea of the
answer. My humble opinion is however that we shouldn't spread names and
logos all over the encyclopedia. Donations from big companies have to
be encouraged, but they should be thanked in a single appropriate page,
not in the main namespace. Of course we will get less money from each of
them, but we could stress this fact when asking for funds: "following our
policies, we have no ads: please be generous". Some very well known NG
Organizations apply this policy since years, and they are still alive and
in good health.
A thing is maybe worth saying to avoid misunderstandings. I know
what the GFDL says, I am not by far "anti-commercial" or whatever like. I
am happy that more people earn some money thanks to our work: this kind of
license is simply magic.
That's all.
best,
Bruno Martelli AKA Ylebru (from it:wiki)
More information about the wikimedia-l
mailing list