[Foundation-l] Site notice change

[David Strauss]

It's not Virgin's choice. If they get to dictate the nature of their
representation, it starts to border on advertising. I think we'll have
better credibility with the community if we link to an article.

Kirill Lokshin wrote:
> On 12/26/06, David Strauss <david at fourkitchens.com> wrote:
>> I don't know if others would agree, but I'd prefer to link to an
>> article. It would certainly seem less commercial.
> 
> I suspect Virgin might not agree. ;-)
> 
> Aside from that, of course, is the practical point that this is
> Wikimedia-wide, not just Wikipedia-wide.  What article would, say,
> Commons link to?  And how about languages that didn't have an article
> on Virgin, or had an utterly inadequate one?
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/attachments/20061226/197ec70e/attachment-0001.pgp>