[Foundation-l] Montenegrin request for new language wikipedia

[Darko Bulatovic]

Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Darko Bulatovic schreef:
>   
>> David Gerard wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> On 01/12/06, Darko Bulatovic <mail at itam.ws> wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> I would like to see some of yours opinions regarding this issue as this
>>>> looks very strange to me.
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> OK: Splitting Serbo-Croatian into three wikis was a ridiculous
>>> mistake, and does not justify compounding the error.
>>>
>>>
>>> - d.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> Do you think that negation of one language is much bigger mistake?
>>
>> Darko Bulatovic
>>     
> Hoi,
> Sabine asked some colleagues (translators) on the mailing lists for 
> professional translators about Montenegrin, the universal answer is that 
> Montenegrin and Serbian is the same language. The point here is that 
> when it DOES make a difference, translators will have business by 
> adapting it for use on the Montenegrin market. In this a text prepared 
> for the Dutch market is different from a Belgian market because there 
> being a big discrepancy in the vocabulary .. all this does not deny us 
> both speaking Dutch.
>
> Thanks,
>     GerardM
>
>
>   
Gerard,
We have talked about this, she talked with serbs translators?

They cant translate from Montenegrin without use of some dictionaries. 
Situation is similar to the " Gorski vijenac" - they cant translate it - 
they cant even understand it fully.

Darko Bulatovic.