[Foundation-l] African Languages Wikipedia Bashing on Slashdot
Martin Benjamin
martin.benjamin at aya.yale.edu
Mon Aug 28 16:19:43 UTC 2006
Regarding Jeffrey Merkey's earlier post, with all respect, the issue of
machine translation is not one that can be addressed in a few weeks with
a couple of native speakers. This isn't the forum to discuss the
nitty-gritty of machine translation issues, however, other than to say
that the quality of Wikipedia entries is much more important than the
quantity, and the only real path to quality Wikipedia entries in African
languages is through real human labor.
The Slashdot discussion is interesting, mostly in what it reveals about
the state of knowledge (or lack thereof) in the tech world about most
things African. Many /.ers write with the attitude that, because
African languages don't matter to them, they don't matter. These are my
comments following on the Slashdot riffs on the article.
The recurring theme of the /. conversation is, why should people waste
their time creating African language Wikipedias if the languages have
low literacy and few computer users? However, the original NYT article
was written about a discussion that has moved well beyond that level.
The questions that the people working on African language Wikipedias
(who have a new discussion list,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/afrophonewikis ) are asking are more like
these:
* Can some of Africa's entrenched economic difficulties relate to
the fact that many of her people do not have access to literacy in
the languages they speak and use on a daily basis?
* How much of the lack of literacy in many languages is related to
the lack of a systematic effort to produce written materials in
those languages?
* If a critical mass of written materials were produced for a given
language, would it create the necessary foundation for widespread
literacy in that language among speakers of that language?
* If speakers of a given language were to develop literacy in that
language, rather than having to learn an entirely different
language (such as English or Arabic) in order to engage in written
communications (send emails, write blogs, read newspapers, get
commodity market and weather reports relevant to the crops they
grow, apply for jobs, evaluate the truth claims of politicians,
etc), might that literacy be a key to overcoming the continent's
persistent economic difficulties?
* Given the certified failure of print publishers and government
agencies (colonial and post-colonial) to produce literacy
materials in most African languages during the past 150 years, and
the rapid success of the Wikipedia model in producing vast amounts
of knowledge material quickly, might the resources of the
Wikipedia world be a way to address the issues of creating
literacy materials for those languages?
* If One Laptop Per Child is indeed a foreseeable reality, and if
Wikipedia is going to come prebundled, and if having literacy
materials in the language a child speaks is a key to the ultimate
success and usefulness of OLPC, isn't creating a good Wikipedia in
that child's language an issue of somewhat immediate concern?
* If any or all of the above, but also given the slow pace of
African language Wikipedias to date, what have the barriers been
thus far, and how can those barriers be overcome in a timely and
systematic way?
More information about the wikimedia-l
mailing list