[Foundation-l] New elections for stewards
daniwo59 at aol.com
daniwo59 at aol.com
Sat Mar 5 10:52:18 UTC 2005
As one of the people who has requested stewardship, I want to comment on
some of the proposed rules:
In a message dated 3/5/2005 3:14:08 AM Eastern Standard Time,
anthere9 at yahoo.com writes:
* it is useless to keep in steward list an inactive
steward. Activity is show best by activity on "request
for permission" (log is sometimes lost). I hence
suggest that any steward with no edits on RfP and no
mention in the log for 6 months be listed as inactive
and with no activity for a year, be removed.
Fully agree. I do, however, think that there should be a cap on the number
of stewards.
* a new election will be held in march (or soon)
It should be very clear who will be eligible to vote in this new election.
What are the criteria for voting.
* candidates should have shown implication in
international matters, so we could possibly require
that the candidate has sysop status on meta.
Working on meta does not necessarily indicate proficiency in international
matters. On the other hand, I do think that there should be some criteria for
becoming a steward that should be clearly defined.
* Candidates should have at least 80% support (neutral
not counted)
To date, I have organized the board election and the two arb comm elections
in Wikipedia. To the best of my recollection (and I can check), no candidate
has ever reached 80 percent of the vote. While I agree on a high threshhold,
this may not be it.
* Anyone can vote provided that the editor has a valid
account on meta with a link to at least one user page
on a project where the editor is a participant
Valid account on meta from when? are we suddenly going to see a rush on meta
accounts?
* In case of suspicion of sock puppetry, developers
could be asked to check and sock puppet votes
cancelled.
What do you think ?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards
Ant
While the ideas are good in principle, I think that they have to be thought
out a bit more.
Danny
More information about the wikimedia-l
mailing list