<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">On behalf of the two of us here at WMF who work on the Scholarship Program (Ellie and Sati), we’d like to offer the following response to the various points raised in this thread:<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div dir="ltr" style="font-family: LucidaGrande;" class=""><div class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><b class="">(1)</b> To the point around <b class="">repeat scholarship recipients</b>: Given the concerns about scholarships being awarded to the same people year over year, for the 2015 Scholarship Program we included a two new questions in the application[1]. From these new questions, the Scholarship Committee could understand how an applicant's previous attendance had changed or improved their Wikimedia contribution, and how attending this year would do so again. To Stuart's previous point, the intention was to set the bar was <i class="">higher</i> for those who had attended Wikimania before on a WMF scholarship, but <i class="">without</i> setting an automatic or blanket penalty. </font></div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class="">As a data point, of the 2015 Scholarship recipients ~26% received a scholarship in 2014 from WMF[2]. Unfortunately, we don't have data readily available to do a year-over-year comparison for past Wikimainias. </font></div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><b class="">(2) and (3)</b> To the point around <b class="">enriching home communities / countries and selection criteria:</b>"Enrichment" was a big focus on the revised 2015 Scholarship application and selection criteria. In previous years, the application questions and selection criteria focused on an applicant's: contribution to the Wikimedia movement, contribution to other free knowledge/software movements, and interest in Wikimaina. Based on feedback from previous scholarship applicants, recipients, the Scholarship Committee, Wikimania organizers, and WMF staff, these questions and criteria were changed to focus on: relevant experience within the Wikimedia movement [3] as well as "Enrichment". </font></div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class="">From the Scholarships page[4], "Enrichment" means: <span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial;" class="">"</span><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 13px;" class="">The ability to share experiences and information with a wider community indicates that the applicant, if awarded a scholarship, would be able to bring those experiences or lessons learned at Wikimania back home, thereby enriching their home wiki community or home country. Applicants are encouraged to write about or provide examples demonstrating this ability; a few examples could be on-wiki reports, personal blog posts, or talks/presentations given about what they learned from an event, conference, or discussion.</span><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 13px;" class=""><br class=""></span></font></div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><font face="Helvetica" class="">To this end, as in 2014 we have required all scholarship recipients to create an on-wiki report[5]. The summarized outcomes from 2014 can be found here[5]. Once all 2015 </font></font><font color="#000000" face="Helvetica" class="">scholarship reports have been submitted, another analysis and summary of outcomes will be posted here[2]. </font></div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class="">[1] Question added into the 2015 application:</font></div><div class=""><ul class=""><li class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><font face="sans-serif" class=""><span style="line-height: 20px;" class="">Have you previously attended Wikimania on a WMF scholarship? YES/NO </span></font></font></li><ul class=""><li class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><font face="sans-serif" class=""><span style="line-height: 20px;" class="">Note: there is already a separate question on "</span></font><span style="font-family: sans-serif; line-height: 20px;" class="">Have you attended Wikimania before? If so, in what year or years?"</span></font></li></ul><li class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><span style="font-family: sans-serif; line-height: 20px;" class="">If YES, please use the space below to tell us about something great that happened as a result of attending Wikimania previously? What are your goals for attending Wikimania again?</span><br class=""></font></li></ul><div class=""><font color="#000000" class="">[2] </font><a href="https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:TPS/Wikimania_scholars/2015_Outcomes" class="">https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:TPS/Wikimania_scholars/2015_Outcomes</a></div></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">[3] <a href="https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Scholarships#Relevant_experience" class="">https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Scholarships#Relevant_experience</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">[4] <a href="https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Scholarships#Enrichment" class="">https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Scholarships#Enrichment</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">[5] <a href="https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:TPS/Wikimania_scholars/Proposed_2015_Process#Outcomes_reported_by_2014_Scholars" class="">https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:TPS/Wikimania_scholars/Proposed_2015_Process#Outcomes_reported_by_2014_Scholars</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">(4) To the point of why we do not offer partial scholarships anymore, the overhead processing to adminster this was high. We also noted that there were regular occurrances of people then declining the offer and partial scholarsips going unused was also high.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">If anyone would like to reach out to either one of us offlist to followup with questions, we can be contacted at:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="mailto:eyoung@wikimedia.org" class="">eyoung@wikimedia.org</a></div><div class=""><a href="mailto:shouston@wikimedia.org" class="">shouston@wikimedia.org</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Ellie Young and Sati Houston</div><div class="">Wikimedia Foundation Community Engagement</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jul 31, 2015, at 7:45 AM, Osmar Valdebenito <<a href="mailto:b1mbo.wikipedia@gmail.com" class="">b1mbo.wikipedia@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2015-07-31 9:16 GMT-03:00 Lane Rasberry <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:lane@bluerasberry.com" target="_blank" class="">lane@bluerasberry.com</a>></span>:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><div class="">Hello,<br class=""><br class="">Leave the fairness of the scholarship process aside. Regardless of its fairness, the process is generating ill-will
because of lack of transparency and poor communication. The problem
might be growing to something beyond what volunteers can manage and
perhaps paid staff support from the communications department of the WMF
would be a worthwhile investment to protect community reputation
considering the seriousness of this, the problem's persistence, and the
fact that a little more communication would go a long way to resolving
the negativity.<br class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div></div>Thanks Praveen for voicing concerns. They are worth addressing and what you are saying is what a significant and large demographic also has been believing for years. I first heard this in 2012. It is good that this year for the first time the list of scholarship recipients was published and shared openly. Regardless of whether the scholarship award process is fair and adequate, it is definitely true that the rumor is circulating among many countries, especially in the Global South, that some people are getting scholarships repeatedly.<br class=""><br class=""></div>Here are some of the complaints which I have repeatedly heard, and which are critical to address for the sake of community health:<br class=""><ol class=""><li class="">People who get scholarships somehow become better candidates for getting more scholarships, when ideally, new people from a region should attend Wikimania every time</li></ol></div></blockquote>As I mentioned, this is complex. Because the option would be to penalize the applications of some people because they attended in the past, even if they made great presentions or where very active in the organization, and I don't really like that idea. People that received scholarships in the past is because they have been very active Wikimedians and that usually doesn't change year to year, so probably they will have great chances in following Wikimanias.<br class=""></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class=""><ol class=""><li class="">In the Global South especially, people who get scholarships actively or unconsciously suppress the development of their local Wikimedia community so that they retain a leadership role and remain the most eligible people to receive scholarships, grants, attention from Wikimedia community leaders, and other privileges.</li></ol></div></blockquote><div class="">Being a member of the so-called Global South, I think this particularly wrong (and almost offensive). This is not an issue that only applies to the so-called Global South, but in general in our movement. Usually, leadership in most of our organizations are very stable, with some exceptions. Particularly because it is something that takes a lot of time and dedication. Saying that scholarship recipients "actively or unconsciously suppress development of local communities" is a huge accusation, especially when most of them work a lot trying to disseminate Wikipedia and increase the participation. And saying that it is "in the Global South especially", even more.<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class=""><ol class=""><li class="">There is a tremendous amount of ignorance and lack of cultural insensitivity about the value of scholarships among WMF staff and Wikimedia community members from richer countries. At this year's Wikimania, we stayed in a city where ~75% of residents make USD 160 a month, (<a href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/07/24/world/social-issues-world/mexico-poverty-rate-hit-46-2-last-year-2-million-join-ranks-poor/" target="_blank" class="">http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/07/24/world/social-issues-world/mexico-poverty-rate-hit-46-2-last-year-2-million-join-ranks-poor/</a>) and stayed in a hotel where the nightly charge per room was $320 or two month's income by local standards. The amount of money thrown around during Wikimania is shocking to many Wikipedians and this issue is never discussed, so far as I know.</li></ol></div></blockquote><div class="">An international conference for ~1000 participants is expensive. We don't know the details but probably the WMF and the local organization made everything possible to have a very good Wikimania and saving resources as much as possible. I think WM2015 was a success and I'm very happy that scholarships recipients were able to be in a hotel next to the rest of the conference, when in other opportunities scholarship recipients had a lot of difficulties regarding accomodation. I think it was a step forward.<br class="">However, I never heard anyone complaining about how much was spent in London, where prices are much higher than in Mexico City and where it was much more difficult for people in developing countries to participate.<br class="">Mexico has a lot of difficulties (just like many other developed countries have), but questioning the decision to host Wikimania there and the decisions made by the local organization is also culturally insensitive. <br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class=""><ol class=""><li class="">Just in general and beyond scholarships - there needs to be more discussion about how money is viewed differently in different places. This applies to grants, staffing, community engagement, and many other things. If complaints are not pouring in about this, it is only because people are not comfortable speaking up. Diversity creates a lot of concerns and we are a very diverse community.</li></ol><p class="">yours,<br class=""></p></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Nicholas Bashour <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:nicholasbashour@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">nicholasbashour@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto" class=""><div class="">I believe that what <span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)" class="">Praveen may be saying is that he thinks the value that a repeat scholarship recipient can gain from coming back to wikimania numerous times is outweighed by the value that someone who has never been to wikimania but has nevertheless been a very involved wikimedian can gain from attending. Therefore, given that there are limited resources, scholarships should always go to the people who can gain the most from receiving them, which Praveen may be arguing will always be someone who has never been to wikimania versus someone who has. He's saying that despite having many repeat scholarship recipients, there has not been any added value on wiki to justify that, and therefore new recipients should be actively prioritized over repeat ones. That's not to say whether or not that's actually the case or that this was the point he was trying to convey, but rather what I understood his argument to be. </span></div><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">Best,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Nicholas</div><div class=""><br class=""></div>Sent from my iPhone</div><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><br class="">Am 31.07.2015 um 07:39 schrieb Nkansah Rexford <<a href="mailto:nkansahrexford@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">nkansahrexford@gmail.com</a>>:<br class=""><br class=""></div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class="">I just want to know why some users were able to achieve scholarship
again and again while regular Wikimedians being excluded. </div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">And that is EXACTLY what Stuart explained. I understood, unless you didn't!</div><div class=""> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class=""> </div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<div class="">On Friday 31 July 2015 04:01 PM, Stuart
Prior wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">
<div style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:#444444" class="">Praveen,<br class="">
<br class="">
I was chair of the Scholarship Committee for this year.<br class="">
<br class="">
It's unfortunate that you didn't get a scholarship, however
there were many high quality applications and sometimes the
difference between success and failure is very small, and I
feel genuinely bad for any Wikimedian with a good application
that didn't make it, but it's very competitive.<br class="">
<br class="">
We do take into account previous scholarship awards, and focus
on making sure new people get a chance. But consistently good
applications and excellent work can warrant repeat scholarship
awards despite this.<br class="">
<br class="">
In some cases where people have been granted Scholarships
previously but have been unable to attend the conference due
to visa issues we have considered that when receiving their
applications for the current year.<br class="">
<br class="">
I won't comment on any individual's scholarship, but "regular
Wikimedians" certainly make up the bulk of the scholars. Edit
count is not the only factor, but it still is a significant
(and clearly verifiable) factor when looking at someone's
application.<br class="">
<br class="">
However, we looked for organisers too. Some of our community
are better facilitators and community builders than they are
editors, and running events, training and building
partnerships are things that were marked favourably.<br class="">
<br class="">
Moreover, two identical applicants can make wildly differing
applications. We look for those that comprehensively
demonstrate their contributions and qualify their statements.<br class="">
<br class="">
Please apply again next year. You have just as much
opportunity as anyone else.<br class="">
<br class="">
Hope this helps.<br class="">
<br class="">
Best<br class="">
<br class="">
Stuart Prior<br class="">
User:Battleofalma</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">On 31 July 2015 at 09:16, Dariusz
Jemielniak <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a class="">darekj@alk.edu.pl</a>></span>
wrote:<br class="">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr" class="">Hi Praveen,</p><p dir="ltr" class="">I've been a steward, as well as the chair of
the FDC for three years, so you may assume I've been
somewhat active in Wikimedia movement. I did not receive
a global scholarship neither (although I did eventually
go, as I got elected to the Board of Trustees).</p><p dir="ltr" class="">I think it is clearly an assumption of bad
faith to say that there is a bias in scholarship
committee. The criteria are explicit, and obviously with
limited resources a large number of excellent
candidates, even with accepted presentations, will not
make it.</p><p dir="ltr" class="">I would suggest you focus on Wikimedia
activity, prepare a great presentation for the next year
as well as a compelling application, and try again.</p><p dir="ltr" class="">Best,</p><p dir="ltr" class="">DJ "pundit"</p>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">31 lip 2015 10:07 "praveenp"
<<a class="">me.praveen@gmail.com</a>>
napisał(a):<br type="attribution" class="">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class=""> Hi,<br class="">
<br class="">
Please don't derail the actual topic of the
thread. I really didnt assume such an
interpretation from quoting his words. Whenever
I asked about the issue to anybody, I generally
got such a reply, which I want to avoid here.<br class="">
<br class="">
If it is need to start a new thread, I will do
that. :-)<br class="">
<br class="">
But please tell me why some people regularly get
scholarships atleast since 2008, active (in
Wikimedia projects / outreach programms) users
never get a chance to share their experience and
problems at Wikimania. <br class="">
<br class="">
Regards,<br class="">
Praveen. P<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<div class="">On Friday 31 July 2015 12:40 PM,
WereSpielChequers wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">Praveen,</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Whether there was anything personal or
confidential in Gerard's private emails to
you is for him to say not for you to decide.<br class="">
<br class="">
Regards
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Jonathan </div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
On 31 Jul 2015, at 05:59, praveenp <<a class="">me.praveen@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br class="">
<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class=""> Hi,<br class="">
<br class="">
Osmar Valdebenito,<br class="">
No offense was intended :-(. For prominent
communities that may be true, but could
you check list of users who got
scholarship from Malayalam community.<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
Amir Ladsgroup,<br class="">
<br class="">
1) As you can see there is nothing
confidential or personal in Gerards reply.
He just gave a summary of "known"
practices.<br class="">
2) Users are not asking for trophies. They
also want to participate Wikimania and
share and get the experience.<br class="">
3) Wikimedia projects are community
processes. I simply don't understand how
granting scholarship to same persons again
and again for five or six years help that
process. I also dont understand that
communication and sharing of multiple
viewpoints, ideas and practices is
possible in the above scenario. <br class="">
4) Yes; If clicking tick marks in
translatewiki on some 500 string in 5
minutes before applying for scholarship
(as reviewing the translation) is a
prominent contribution.<br class="">
<br class="">
In the beginning every body treated equal,
we have multiple participants (with
understandable reasons) for Wikimania. It
started to shrink later and now people
plainly believe granting scholarship is an
act of favoritism. I also want to prove I
am wrong.<br class="">
<br class="">
Regards,<br class="">
Praveen. P<br class="">
User:Praveenp<br class="">
<br class="">
PS: Mail striped because mailman held my
previous reply claiming " Message body is
too big:"<br class="">
<br class="">
<div class="">On Friday 31 July 2015 05:03 AM, Amir
Ladsgroup wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">There are several issues
I want to comment:
<div class="">1-First of all. Do you have
permission from Gerard to publish
your conversation? Maybe there is
something confidential in it, Did
you care to check?</div>
<div class="">2- Scholarship is not award or
trophy, bear that in mind.</div>
<div class="">3- People are expected to come
here and learn, communicate, etc.
that's why a same person gets
scholarship, </div>
<div class="">4- No one's wife got scholarship
because of being wife of someone.
They probably are prominent
contributors too.</div>
<div class="">5- Check my first question and
answer that. (Emphasizing)</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Best</div>
</div>
<br class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="">On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at
12:05 AM Osmar Valdebenito <<a class="">b1mbo.wikipedia@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr" class="">Sorry, but when I
read "No regular Wikimedian get
any scholarship", I stopped
reading.<br class="">
It is not only a lie, but also
very unfair to all the extremely
great Wikimedians that attended
and made great contributions in
Wikimania, and also the volunteers
that have helped now and in the
past reviewing and evaluated
thousand of applications in the
Scholarship Committee.</div>
<br class="">
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class=""><span class="">_______________________________________________</span><br class="">
<span class="">Wikimania-l mailing list</span><br class="">
<span class=""><a class="">Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a></span><br class="">
<span class=""><a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l</a></span><br class="">
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
<fieldset class=""></fieldset>
<br class="">
<pre class="">_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
<a class="">Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
<br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
Wikimania-l mailing list<br class="">
<a class="">Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l</a><br class="">
<br class="">
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
Wikimania-l mailing list<br class="">
<a class="">Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l</a><br class="">
<br class="">
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
<br clear="all" class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
<fieldset class=""></fieldset>
<br class="">
<pre class="">_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
<a class="">Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
</blockquote><br class=""><br class="">-- <br class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><a href="http://google.com/+Nkansahrexford" style="font-size:small" target="_blank" class="">+Rexford</a><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102);font-size:small" class=""> | </span><a href="http://khophi.co/about" style="font-size:small" target="_blank" class="">khophi.co</a><br class=""></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br class="">
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><span class="">_______________________________________________</span><br class=""><span class="">Wikimania-l mailing list</span><br class=""><span class=""><a href="mailto:Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org" target="_blank" class="">Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a></span><br class=""><span class=""><a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l</a></span><br class=""></div></blockquote></div></div></div><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">
Wikimania-l mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org" target="_blank" class="">Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l</a><br class="">
<br class=""></blockquote></div><br class=""><br clear="all" class=""><br class="">-- <br class=""></div></div><span class=""><font color="#888888" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">Lane Rasberry<br class=""></div>user:bluerasberry on Wikipedia<br class=""><div class="">206.801.0814<br class=""><a href="mailto:lane@bluerasberry.com" target="_blank" class="">lane@bluerasberry.com</a></div></div></div>
</font></span></div>
<br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">
Wikimania-l mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org" target="_blank" class="">Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l</a><br class="">
<br class=""></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Wikimania-l mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org" class="">Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br class="">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>