[Wikimania-l] What to do about 2012, and the future

theo10011 de10011 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 19 12:37:58 UTC 2011


I agree to some extent, a biannual event is an eventuality we have to
consider. But would making it biannual have any effect on the quality of the
bids, the benefit of having such a diverse community implies that the two
teams hosting consecutive events might not be affected by each other at all.
The bids might not improve even if the event became biannual. The bidding
process lasts for months, the planning stage probably even longer, awarding
more time to a bidding team might not improve the quality of the bids. The
biggest benefit I would assume, would be providing a team that has already
won the bid, more time to prepare for the event.

Again, I would take this opportunity to bring up an earlier suggestion of a
Wikimania committee, an oversight committee or an advisory group could
improve the bidding process and transfer some of the burden of planning to a
specialized body. The experience gained from every year could be retained
within the committee, this I believe might have the largest impact on the
quality and the frequency of the bids. This might standardized the process
and offload a lot of burden from the host team.


Regards


Theo


On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Finne Boonen <hennar at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:44, Lodewijk <lodewijk at effeietsanders.org>
> wrote:
> >> To me, the lack of strong bids is an indicator that holding a big,
> >> expensive and complex international conference in a changing location
> year
> >> after year is not very realistic in the long term - and Wikimania is
> just
> >> becoming ever more big, expensive and complex (for example, WM2011 will
> see
> >> at least three side events preceding/co-locating with it).
>
> Maybe the problem is that every conference tries to do better/bigger
> then the previous ones? Which can quickly lead to 'too
> big/complicated'
>
> >> Few international organizations do that. In fact, many international
> >> conferences such as the International Congress of Mathematicians are
> held
> >> every 4 years! I don't think it will be a bad sign for the Wikimedia
> >> movement / foundation to decide to hold Wikimania every two years, just
> a
> >> realistic understanding on its part that the tradition of annual
> Wikimanias
>
> However, most other fields have several conferences a year where
> people meet each other. I'm not sure we have enough events that allow
> real international 'mingling' to take place. In my experience most
> conferences we have are very local events, and there is real benefit
> from interacting in person with a wider community then the local one.
>
> Finne
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimania-l/attachments/20110119/3432fef8/attachment.htm 


More information about the Wikimania-l mailing list