[WikiEN-l] WikiEN-l Digest, Vol 138, Issue 7
R a N d Y G a L a T i
randygalati at hotmail.com
Sun Mar 29 13:53:18 UTC 2015
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 29, 2015, at 8:01 AM, wikien-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
> Send WikiEN-l mailing list submissions to
> wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> wikien-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> wikien-l-owner at lists.wikimedia.org
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of WikiEN-l digest..."
> Please do NOT hit "reply" to this digest without trimming the quoted section to only the message you are replying to!
> Today's Topics:
> 1. Re: Privacy Study Looking for Volunteers (James Alexander)
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 05:38:10 -0700
> From: James Alexander <jalexander at wikimedia.org>
> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Privacy Study Looking for Volunteers
> <CAOcBxPNL6Q2sXujPkuADBXyNbdZNoyao2sTehTsjsgtKrtFLjQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> The idea of the IP being more private in the history/ public logs (for
> example a unique hash so that you know it's "an IP" but not where/what IP"
> ) is one that I know has been discussed and is desired by a good number
> within the foundation including within legal. I'll try to look for the
> phabricator task about it tomorrow. I think that's something that is likely
> to happen, it isn't easy though and requires a fair number of resources to
> be pointed at it to get it done so it's a question of priorities and
> convincing those who decide those things that it should be higher. I
> believe it's something, privacy wise, that legal would really like.
> I think it is unlikely in the short to medium term, however, to get rid of
> the IPs in the backend (in server logs and in the checkuser system for
> example) because the replacements just aren't there. I've spent a good
> amount of time thinking of a way to make the checkuser system as usable as
> necessary without revealing IPs for example (including a consultant who
> looked a lot but didn't really come up with anything we didn't know
> already). I think it's doable, but it would be a very difficult and long
> design process and I think it's unlikely in the near future.
> James Alexander
> Community Advocacy
> Wikimedia Foundation
> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Kyanos <someanon126 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't believe a different license is needed. CC licenses can be used for
>> anonymous works: The author is not given and does not have to be credited,
>> but everything else (attribution of the work and share-alike) would stay
>> edits are considered to have no named author," would be sufficient.
>>> On 03/27/2015 06:41 AM, WereSpielChequers wrote:
>>> Perhaps we should move to a different licensing model for future IP
>>> edits. CC0 for IP edits would be a more sensible license for edits by an IP
>>> where in many cases no-one could attribute the edit to the individual who
>>> made it. If people don't want to release their edits as CC0 they can always
>>> create an account.
>>> Jonathan Cardy
>>>> On 27 Mar 2015, at 10:28, Elias Friedman <elipongo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> It's actually required so as to provide attribution as per the Creative
>>>> Commons and other licenses we operate under.
>>>> Sent from my Droid 4
>>>> Elias Friedman A.S., CCEMT-P
>>>> אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי
>>>> elipongo at gmail.com
>>>> "יְהִי אוֹר"
>> WikiEN-l mailing list
>> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> End of WikiEN-l Digest, Vol 138, Issue 7
More information about the WikiEN-l