[WikiEN-l] serious fallacies
Charles Matthews
charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com
Tue Apr 16 17:28:02 UTC 2013
On 16 April 2013 14:20, Kathleen McCook <klmccook at gmail.com> wrote
> I agree with you, Charles. These fallacies are quite transparent. And it is
> too bad that much good effort and input to the Wikipedia initiative can be
> lost due to those who feel it is their to be "forthright" (wiggle word)
> rather than helpful. There is nothing wrong with being helpful. There
> is everything wrong with a nasty officious edge.
To be clear, I don't engage in these debates to diminish the
community. I come in as a "policy wonk" if I feel the policy involved
is being misread, too close to the letter. That's not the trouble
here.
Charles
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list