[WikiEN-l] Difficulty making structural changes to WP due to human nature?

[Steven Walling]

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Alan Liefting <aliefting at ihug.co.nz> wrote:

> Is it just me or do others find it difficult to instigate any sort of
> changes to policies, guidelines, layout, Manual of Style and related
> matters regardless of how minor they are?
> Could it be that WP is a reflection of human behaviour and has become a
> talkfest where nothing changes because of our inherently conservative
> nature?
> Or am I trying to satisfy the readers of WP rather than editors and
> readers? Since readers do not edit they never get to have a say so the
> editors get what they want (yes I know - editors are readers as well).
>
>
> Alan Liefting
>

Research on the amount of bytes added to different namespaces suggests it is
true that the project namespace is stagnant.[1] The largest period of growth
in the bytes added to the project namespace began roughly in 2003 and
tapered off to a smaller, steady proportion of all content added by 2006.

One way we might quantify this in a more editor-centric way is to look at
the top contributors (by edits and/or by net bytes changed) to major
policies, guidelines etc. and get some data on what cohort those editors
were from, what they are doing, and when the edits by those top contributors
were made.

If anyone is interested in this/is not offended by the idea of looking at
specific editors in public, I'm happy to start some documentation on Meta.
It's pretty easy to grab some lists, but qualitatively examining edit
histories takes more time and could always use more help from people who can
read a diff. :-)

Steven

1.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/meta/wiki/Research:Wikimedia_Summer_of_Research_2011/Summary_of_Findings