[WikiEN-l] [[Long Dong Silver]]

George Herbert george.herbert at gmail.com
Fri Sep 16 02:35:19 UTC 2011


Fred?  Could you please explain why you suppressed the revisions?

None of the criteria seems to apply.



On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Steve Summit <scs at eskimo.com> wrote:
> It's still in Google's cache.  It doesn'tlook so very bad,
> that I can see.
>
> The last entry on the talk page indicates that the page was
> deleted (and, yes, supporessed) by Fred at 00:41.
>
>
> George Herbert wrote:
>> Ok,
>>
>> A. The assertion that he fails PORNBIO seems rather flat on the face
>> of it, based on my moderate familiarity with 70s/80s porn, and
>>
>> B. WTF happened with the article history?  It seems to have been hard
>> deleted rather than normal deleted.  I can't even go back and check
>> the version diffs to see what was actually there previously.  I can't
>> even tell who deleted the revs, as far as I can see.
>>
>> Bad, bad form.
>>
>>
>> -george
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Phil Nash <phnash at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> > Fred Bauder wrote:
>> >>> This article needs to be put out of its misery; it's been tagged for
>> >>> additional citations for 21 months, and still does not meet the
>> >>> [[WP:PORNBIO]] criteria. It also appears to contain unsourced BLP
>> >>> vandalism
>> >>> (Liam McBride?) . All citations refer to one incident in which he was
>> >>> referred to in passing, which does not confer notability. As for "His
>> >>> head
>> >>> is also pictured in an episode of the show Futurama entitled "A Head
>> >>> in the
>> >>> Polls.", as far as I am aware about this performer, his head is the
>> >>> least notable part of his anatomy.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'd do it myself, but.....
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Seems like a close question to me, but I think Thomas was referring to
>> >> himself, not some obscure porn star.
>> >>
>> >> Fred
>> >
>> > Even so, LDS fails [[WP:GNG]] per [[WP:ONEVENT]] on that basis, and his
>> > notability should be judged by [[WP:PORNBIO]] and not otherwise, since the
>> > thrust (sorry!) of the article is that he is notable as a porn star and not
>> > as a bit-player in the machinations of US politics. The article, as it
>> > stands, is a disgrace to Wikipedia's standards, if it still claims to have
>> > any.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > WikiEN-l mailing list
>> > WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -george william herbert
>> george.herbert at gmail.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WikiEN-l mailing list
>> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>



-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com



More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list