[WikiEN-l] Tag removals by readers (was: Newbie recruitment: referencing)
WereSpielChequers
werespielchequers at gmail.com
Thu Nov 3 17:22:54 UTC 2011
For some of them why not go one step further and replace the template with
an automatically generated hidden category?
Dead end, uncategorised, undercategorised and orphan could all be replaced
with fully automated hidden categories; no need for the adding or
subtraction of templates. Though we'd need a template or hidden cat for
unsuccessful deorphaning attempts.
WereSpielChequers
On 3 November 2011 13:00, Carcharoth <carcharothwp at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk>
> wrote:
> > On 3 November 2011 11:10, Carcharoth <carcharothwp at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> safe and then move on". And then someone else, later, might fix the
> >> article during general editing without even looking at the tag, and
> >> not remove the tag, or might expect others to remove the tag (no,
> >> really, that is a common attitude among some people who prefer others
> >> to judge any remedial work they have done - you put the tag there, you
> >> should come back and assess whether it is still needed).
> >
> > There's also a widespread belief that "I shouldn't/can't remove them".
> > I regularly see emails in OTRS saying "I've fixed X page, but the tags
> > are still there, can you check it out"; I've seen it occasionally on
> > talkpages as well, though it's less common.
>
> Thank-you for confirming from your OTRS experience that this is an
> actual problem.
>
> <snip>
>
> > Both beliefs are helped by the fact that a lot of people honestly
> > don't realise the lead section can be edited - they use section edit
> > links, and don't realise that editing the page is how you get at the
> > "zeroth section" of the article. If you don't see the template when
> > you edit, you're less likely to realise it's a template to be removed.
> > - and even if you know about templates, if you can't figure out how to
> > get to it, you're stuck!
>
> Interesting. Hadn't thought of that.
>
> > Working on the assumption that there are people who want to remove
> > templates but are having problems doing so, one solution here might be
> > to build on the (excellent) work that's been done with HotCat, and
> > implement a "remove this tag" link on the template itself. Click this,
> > you get a little line saying "are the problems still here?", click
> > yes, and it loads-and-saves the change in the same way that a HotCat
> > category change works.
> >
> > Thoughts? This would be one way to get our readers to do the triage
> > and cleanup for us...
>
> +1
>
> In fact, +100.
>
> Carcharoth
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list