[WikiEN-l] Wikipedia article on [[Santorum (neologism)]]

[Richard Farmbrough]

Presumably we are evaluating the arguments that are not /ad hominem /on 
their merits, rather than on the /ad hominem/ basis that their author 
elsewhere makes /ad hominem /attacks?

RMF

On 25/05/2011 22:38, David Gerard wrote:
>
> See, at this point you completely blew your credibility in this
> discussion by slipping into ad hominem. That's where you wiped out all
> gains from your previous posts in the thread. Don't do this if you
> want to be taken seriously.
>
>
> - d.