[WikiEN-l] 10 Media coverage, was Re: Wired: Wikipedia weirdness

[Carcharoth]

The Signpost (on en-wikipedia) is also collecting news articles as
well, and may have better English-language coverage (the other site is
good as a starting point for the worldwide coverage, but attempting to
be comprehensive with something like that is laudable if difficult -
at some point the coverage of Wikipedia outstripped the ability of
Wikipedians to document it - wonder what that says about Wikipedia).

In fact, I have a theory that Wikipedia makes only *part* of the
Internet not suck. (that should be in a new post).

Carcharoth

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Steven Walling
<steven.walling at gmail.com> wrote:
> The Economist is in there. The FT piece probably isn't because they've
> paywalled their site.
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Charles Matthews <
> charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/01/2011 23:59, phoebe ayers wrote:
>> > All of those things are true, to my knowledge :)
>> >
>> > There's a page to collect Wikipedia10 media coverage at:
>> > http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_coverage
>> >
>> Three pieces of BBC coverage today: a World Service documentary
>> (
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2011/01/110111_wikipedia_at_10.shtml
>> )
>> and a short report from Jimbo's party on the PM programme (radio). Also
>> main BBC TV news with User:Chase Me Ladies, I'm the Cavalry. There was a
>> Financial Times piece, and something in The Economist (? - not seen that
>> yet). All-in-all that page seems to need work.
>>
>> Charles
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WikiEN-l mailing list
>> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>