No subject

and with his mouth open, I suspect the article will be of the same
anti-Wikipedia vein as previous coverage of this topic by FOX News.
That, though, is secondary to the tenet that everything produced by
FOX is unfit to be called journalism.

The feature says that

> Essentially=85 [Jimbo] has gone from having free reign over the content a=
nd people involved in the websites

How many years have passed since Jimbo's role in the project has been
more than ceremonial? Around three, as a conservative guess?

AGK