[WikiEN-l] Administrator coup / mass deletions
Cool Hand Luke
failure.to.communicate at gmail.com
Thu Jan 21 14:48:51 UTC 2010
You have quoted Malleus and attributed it to me. I don't know why. If you
think I should recuse from this case, I will. Don't trouble yourself over
that.
To clarify, I said "I support any civil disobedience *in support of BLP*."
Prior to my arrival on ArbCom, the policy was described in this way:
"Administrators are authorized to use any and *all means* at their disposal
to ensure that every Wikipedia article is in full compliance with the letter
and spirit of the biographies of living persons policy."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Footnoted_quotes#Special_enforcement_on_biographies_of_living_persons
In a very real way, BLP trumps all other policies, as it ought to.
Remember also that "The burden of proof is on those who wish to retain the
article to demonstrate that it is compliant with every aspect of the
policy."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff
Cool Hand Luke
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Apoc 2400 <apoc2400 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>
> > 2010/1/21 Apoc 2400 <apoc2400 at gmail.com>:
> > > Is there anyone here who can do something about this before it becomes
> an
> > > even bigger wheel-war?
> >
> > Try ArbCom. Keeping admins in check is their job.
> >
>
> Unfortunately, at least one arbitrator is part of the group.
> "Civil disobedience is often necessary." --User:Cool Hand Luke
>
>
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list