[WikiEN-l] BLP, medical information, and media controversy

[Thomas Dalton]

2009/9/21 Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com>:
> But if the only substance to the controversy is rumour, and speculative
> discussion of rumours, we don't need either BLP or NPOV to work to
> exclude it or cut it back to a bare statement.

I disagree. The controversy is notable, so why not discuss it? Perhaps
it should be split off into a different article with just a brief
summary in the BLP, but I don't see why it should be ignored.