[WikiEN-l] Another Media and Wikipedia blackout on NYT reporter in Afghanistan

[wjhonson at aol.com]

I really don't see this as IAR.
It seems the argument is that it's firmly BLP policy.  That for some 
reason (inexplicable apparently), keeping the name of a kipnap victim 
secret, helps them to not be killed.  Personally the argument seems 
flat to me.  But at any rate, if we were to have a discussion on 
finding consensus, I would expect it to revolve around BLP.



-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>
To: fredbaud at fairpoint.net; English Wikipedia 
<wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Wed, Sep 9, 2009 12:22 pm
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Another Media and Wikipedia blackout on NYT 
reporter in Afghanistan










2009/9/9 Fred Bauder <fredbaud at fairpoint.net>:
> Actually, no, that is a throw-away. But we do need to get a little
> smarter. We might have something come up that is a bit more serious.

More serious than life and death?

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l