[WikiEN-l] Can sweet reason still work on en:wp? Occasionally.

[Ray Saintonge]

Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/10/22 Surreptitiousness:
>   
>> stevertigo wrote:
>>     
>>> So the question is, how do we aggregate and sort arguments such that
>>> we can apply a meta process for quickly discerning good, valid,
>>> arguments, from those that aren't? Other than "IAR" that is?
>>>       
>> Didn't we used to reformat discussions? Maybe we need to re-integrate
>> that into our tool-box.
>>     
> You mean refactoring? Refactoring an ongoing discussion is usually
> very controversial and not worth the drama. Refactoring a closed
> discussion might make a more useful archive, particularly I'm not sure
> archives get read enough to be worth the effort.

Ooops! You're right; it should have been "refactoring", and I should 
have responded accordingly.

Ec