[WikiEN-l] Perfection

[Jay Litwyn]

"Thomas Dalton" <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:a4359dff0905041400s344e381bl8129696714d09af5 at mail.gmail.com...
> 2009/5/4 stevertigo <stvrtg at gmail.com>:
>> Dealing with an issue on [[Talk:Perfect crime]]:
>>
>> Me: "...which is of course not to say that the concept of "perfect crime" 
>> is
>> meaningless, just that it only has meaning outside of a religious view 
>> and
>> within very narrow contexts like colloquial usage and crime novels. A
>> paragraph on the religious point of view doesn't hurt the encyclopedia 
>> and
>> in fact gives the article greater depth and illumination."
>
> I'm sorry, what is your point? This isn't a good place to discuss
> individual articles, keep that on the talk pages. Did you have a
> general point you wanted to discuss?

That rule excludes me, so I do not like it.
The name of the group is not "External Affairs".