[WikiEN-l] Date conditional switching templates

Carcharoth carcharothwp at googlemail.com
Tue May 12 18:30:42 UTC 2009


On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
> 2009/5/12 stevertigo <stvrtg at gmail.com>:
>
>
>> Better to do something like:
>> "Wikimania {{dateswitch|is scheduled to begin on|began on|August 26, 2009}},
>> and {{dateswitch|will run until|ran until|August 28, 2009}}"
>>
>> Or (simpler):
>> "Wikimania {{dateswitch|will run from|ran from|August 26-28, 2009}}.
>>
>> Producing:
>> ante) "Wikimania will run from August 26-28, 2009.
>> post) "Wikimania ran from August 26-28, 2009.
>
> Is having "Wikimania will run...", read after the fact, really a
> problem for us? I mean, people read things all the time that refer to
> ongoing or past events in the future tense; they just notice the text
> is a bit out-of-date and carry on. Yeah, it's suboptimal, but people
> don't seem unduly distressed by it on a day-to-day basis.
>
> More importantly, there's two new problems that this template would
> introduce, aside from the markup concerns.
>
> a) It makes us a hostage to fortune.
>
> b) It gives a spurious sense of timeliness.
>
> The first is fairly clear - if the event *doesn't* happen, for
> whatever reason, or is postponed, or the like, then unless we remember
> to go and fix it, we've published an article claiming it did. This is
> pretty definitely bad, because it's taken a factually-accurate
> statement (intended to begin X) and turned it into a
> factually-incorrect one (began X).
>
> The second is a little fuzzier - if I read an article which says
> something was intended to happen last week, I know that it's an old
> article, that it may not be right. If I read an article which says
> something *did* happen last week, however, I assume it's been written
> in the past few days, that it's fairly up-to-date, etc. Are we doing
> our readers a disservice by giving off these signals when the actual
> content of the article hasn't been changed?

Agree wholeheartedly with Andrew Grey here. For the reasons he gives,
this sort of thing doesn't really work.

Carcharoth



More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list