[WikiEN-l] Neutrality enforcement: a proposal

[stevertigo]

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, SlimVirgin <slimvirgin at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> This is the key point, I think.  We don't have an absolute definition
> of neutrality.  We don't even have a "I know it when I see it" kind of
> system.  Neutrality -- everywhere -- is a work in progress.  Now,
>


> That's exactly right. All this group would be looking for are good-faith
> efforts to edit in accordance with the NPOV policy. It's not an attempt to
> control content, but behaviour. Perhaps we should change the title to
> reflect that.


You lost me. If you say its all about the content, I'd be on board. You say
its about "behaviour[-alism]," and I go now elsewhere to let you rethink the
idea entirely.

-SV