[WikiEN-l] Rod Liddle, Spectator, on his Wikipedia article

[geni]

2009/5/6 Carcharoth <carcharothwp at googlemail.com>:
> On reflection, there is lots of vandalism to that talk page, and it
> doesn't match Liddle's description of what he claims to have added.
> i.e. Unless he gives more details, he is almost certainly having us on
> here. But doing so in a magazine article like that without providing a
> link that would demonstrate the truth of what he is saying just shows
> how little he understands how a wiki works.
>

Well I went through the [[Rob Liddle]] to see If I could find him
defending himself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rod_Liddle&diff=104862199&oldid=101866916

Perhaps but nothing of significance on the Cristiano Ronaldo article
around that date.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rod_Liddle&diff=prev&oldid=104862199

Again possible but nothing of significance on the Cristiano Ronaldo
article around that date

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rod_Liddle&diff=prev&oldid=133409794

Loads of vandalism on Cristiano Ronaldo around that date but nothing
that fits Liddle's claims.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/81.156.42.14

Is another candidate but again nothing




-- 
geni