[WikiEN-l] News agencies are not RSs

[geni]

2009/6/30 Risker <risker.wp at gmail.com>:
> 2009/6/30 geni <geniice at gmail.com>
>
>> 2009/6/30 Ian Woollard <ian.woollard at gmail.com>:
>> > Clearly, when the subject of the BLP's life may be significantly
>> > endangered, through no fault of their own, from information that may
>> > be widely published for the first time in the wikipedia, then there's
>> > a very reasonable case that it shouldn't be published in the
>> > wikipedia.
>>
>> Of course that would create the problem that we would be taking the
>> position that more notable people are somehow more deserving of
>> protection.
>>
>> --
>>
> Um, no. The less notable don't have articles, so we have nothing to
> contribute there.

Remove X bit of information that has not been previously widely
published or random kidnapped tourist dies.

But of course we don't have an article on random kidnapped tourist.


-- 
geni